The Grouchy Grammarian: A How-Not-To Guide to the 47 Most by Thomas Parrish
By Thomas Parrish
Do you devote apostrophe atrocities?
Are you plagued by the lie/lay conundrum?
Do you end up caught among floaters and danglers?
Do your matters and your verbs refuse to agree?
If so, you're no longer on my own. one of the most favourite execs in television broadcasting and at significant newspapers and magazines-people who fairly should still comprehend better-are responsible of creating all-too-common grammatical error. during this delightfully fun, smart consultant, Thomas Parrish issues out real-life grammar gaffes from top-notch courses equivalent to the recent York occasions and the recent Yorker to demonstrate simply how frequent those blunders are. With pink pen in hand, Parrish's fictional buddy the Grouchy Grammarian leads the cost, analyzing the forty-seven commonest errors in English and providing the fundamentals of fine grammar with a captivating mix of fussiness and customary experience. All of which makes The Grouchy Grammarian the main interesting, obtainable how-not-to advisor you'll ever learn.
Read or Download The Grouchy Grammarian: A How-Not-To Guide to the 47 Most Common Mistakes in English Made by Journalists, Broadcasters, and Others Who Should Know Better PDF
Best journalism books
The Gutenberg Galaxy catapulted Marshall McLuhan to status as a media theorist and, in time, a new media prognosticator. Fifty years after its preliminary book, this landmark textual content is extra major than ever sooner than.
Readers may be surprised via McLuhan’s prescience, unequalled via a person given that, predicting as he did the dramatic technological concepts that experience essentially replaced how we speak. The Gutenberg Galaxy foresaw the networked, compressed ‘global village’ that might emerge within the late-twentieth and twenty-first centuries — regardless of having been written whilst black-and-white tv was once ubiquitous.
This re-creation of The Gutenberg Galaxy celebrates either the centennial of McLuhan’s delivery and the fifty-year anniversary of the book’s ebook. a brand new inside layout updates The Gutenberg Galaxy for twenty-first-century readers, whereas honouring the leading edge, avant-garde spirit of the unique. This variation additionally comprises new introductory essays that light up McLuhan’s lasting impact on various scholarly fields and pop culture.
A must-read if you inhabit today’s worldwide village, The Gutenberg Galaxy is an essential street map for our evolving communique landscape.
The general public sphere is related to be in main issue. Dumbing down, tabloidisation, infotainment and spin are imagined to contaminate it, adversely affecting the standard of political journalism and of democracy itself. there's a pervasive pessimism in regards to the courting among the media and democracy, and common problem for the way forward for the political strategy.
It really is not going the Midwest will ever see a extra eminent band of activities men. they're invoice Grigsby, Joe McGuff, Len Dawson, Don Fortune and Harold Ensley.
The gendered nature of the connection among the click and emergence of cultural citizenship from the 1860s to the Nineteen Thirties is explored via unique info and insightful comparisons among India, Britain and France during this built-in method of women's illustration in newspapers, their position as information resources and their expert job.
- The Language and Sexuality Reader
- Would They Lie to You?
- Online News and the Public
- What Good Is Journalism?: How Reporters and Editors Are Saving America's Way of Life
- News Coverage of Violence against Women: Engendering Blame
Additional info for The Grouchy Grammarian: A How-Not-To Guide to the 47 Most Common Mistakes in English Made by Journalists, Broadcasters, and Others Who Should Know Better
51 To look at this point in another way: may goes with can, and might goes with could. ) One other set of may-might meanings deserves discussion here. When we say “I may go to Boston tomorrow,” we are not merely expressing a possibility; we’re saying that tomorrow quite likely will see us on the way to Boston. If we say that we might win the lottery, we’re acknowledging a possibility (after all, we bought a ticket) but are realistically expressing a high degree of doubt about it. Thus, if we say that we might go to Boston, we’re saying that it could happen but there’s not much chance of it.
It should be “support . . ) Shaking his head, my friend muttered something about “these reporters,” and went on: “Nobody’s ever told them what they ought to say, and they haven’t been curious enough to ﬁnd out for themselves. ” I couldn’t argue much with that—even if I’d been foolish enough to try. ” Apparently the plural “Americans” was so intimately close that the wire-service writer couldn’t resist making the verb plural to match it—and thus succeeded in producing nonsense. Somewhat more complex is the situation in which you take a close look at the subject and it seems at least a bit plural but A G R E E M E N T; O R , W H E R E D I D T H E S U B J E C T G O ?
Two words serving as nouns are sitting right there in the subject spot, aren’t they? Yes, indeed they are, but nevertheless the sentence is telling us about one punishment, not two. Although the rule of subject-verb agreement, or concord, did not become ﬁrmly set until the eighteenth century, it has since, as my grouchy friend says, become the key to clarity for the sentence and thus to true communication. ” Well, yes, there are two nouns sitting in the subject spot, but, as Bryant goes on to say, “if a group of words, even though plural in form, creates one conception in the mind of the person using them as a subject, a singular verb follows.