The Great Philosophers: An Introduction to Western by Bryan Magee
By Bryan Magee
Starting with the demise of Socrates in 399 BC, and following the strand of philosophical inquiry during the centuries to contemporary figures equivalent to Bertrand Russell and Wittgenstein, Bryan Magee's conversations with fifteen modern writers and philosophers offer an available and fascinating account of Western philosophy and its maximum thinkers. With contributions from A. J. Ayer, Bernard Williams, Martha Nussbaum, Peter Singer, and John Searle, the e-book isn't just an advent to the philosophers of the previous, yet supplies a useful perception into the view and personalities of a few of the main influential philosophers of the 20 th century.
Read Online or Download The Great Philosophers: An Introduction to Western Philosophy PDF
Similar history & surveys books
This e-book highlights Kant's basic distinction among the mechanistic and dynamical conceptions of subject, that is principal to his perspectives concerning the foundations of physics, and is better understood when it comes to the distinction among gadgets of sensibility and issues in themselves.
For Self-Examination and its better half piece pass judgement on for your self! are the end result of Søren Kierkegaard's "second authorship," which his Concluding Unscientific Postscript. one of the easiest and such a lot quite simply comprehended of Kierkegaard's books, the 2 works are a part of the signed direct communications, as extraordinary from his prior pseudonymous writings.
The 1st dictionary devoted to Badiou's paintings, bringing jointly over 35 prime students within the fieldFrom Antiphilosophy to Worlds and from Beckett to Wittgenstein, over ninety entries during this dictionary supply unique factors and engagements together with his key techniques and a few of his significant interlocutors.
First released in 1848, Christian Discourses is a quartet of items written and organized in contrasting kinds. components One and 3, "The Cares of the Pagans" and "Thoughts That Wound from Behind--for Upbuilding," function a polemical overture to Kierkegaard's collision with the status quo of Christendom.
- Die philosophischen Schriften: Band III
- Technique, discourse, and consciousness: an introduction to the philosophy of Jacques Ellul
- Wittgenstein: conversations, 1949-1951
- Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems (Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements)
- Philosophy in the Middle Ages: The Christian, Islamic, and Jewish Traditions
- The New Patricians: An Essay on Values and Consciousness
Extra resources for The Great Philosophers: An Introduction to Western Philosophy
It depends upon knowing that in the past you have sometimes woken up and found you had been dreaming; it depends on the idea that sometimes you sleep, sometimes you wake, sometimes you dream, and so on. So it does depend on knowing something about the world. But then he took another step, to the most extreme doubt possible. He imagined a malign spirit (the malicious demon, as it’s sometimes called in the literature) whose sole intent was to deceive him as much as it could. He then put to himself the following question: suppose there were such a spirit, is there anything he could not mislead me about?
Can you explain how Descartes’s methodological doubt worked? Williams Since he was looking for certainty, he started by laying aside anything in which he could find the slightest doubt. As he famously put it, it’s like having a barrel of apples, and some of them are bad and some of them are sound, and you want to separate out the sound ones. So you take them all out first, look at them one by one, throw away the ones that are dubious and put back only the absolutely sound ones. So he started by trying to empty his mind of all beliefs, laying aside anything in which he could see the slightest doubt.
As he said, the malicious demon can deceive me as he will, but he can never deceive me in this respect, namely to make me believe that I am thinking when I am not. If I have a false thought that is still a thought: in order to have a deceived thought, I’ve got to have a thought, so it must be true that I am thinking. And from that Descartes drew another conclusion, or at least he immediately associated with that another truth, namely that he existed. And so his fundamental first certainty was ‘I am thinking, therefore I exist’; or Cogito ergo sum in the Latin formulation, from which it is often called simply the Cogito.