Risk-Based Waste Classification in California (Compass by National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life
By National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Commission on Life Sciences, Committee on Risk-Based Criteria for Non-RCRA Hazardous Waste
Addresses the regulatory requirement lower than part 57004 of the California future health and defense Code. Discusses the clinical foundation of the proposed waste category process, topic to exterior medical peer evaluate through the nationwide Academy of Sciences, and the collage of California. Softcover.
Read or Download Risk-Based Waste Classification in California (Compass Series) PDF
Similar waste management books
The continually expanding human inhabitants, has ended in an important call for for processed and packaged meals. because of this call for, quite a lot of water, air, electrical energy and gas are fed on every day for nutrition processing, transportation and upkeep reasons. even though none of the so much seriously polluting, the meals does give a contribution to the rise in quantity of waste produced in addition to to the power expended to take action.
During this landmark set of papers, specialists from all over the world current the most recent and so much promising ways to either the speculation and perform of powerful environmental administration. to accomplish sustainable improvement, corporations and person electorate needs to conform to environmental legislation and rules.
This hugely useful reference provides for the 1st time in one quantity all kinds of environmental degradation a metal compound may well suffer in the course of its processing, garage, and repair. Clarifying normal and localized corrosion results, Environmental Degradation of Metals describes the consequences of atmospheric publicity, high-temperature gases, soil, water, susceptible and robust chemical substances, liquid metals, and nuclear radiation.
Agro-industrial Wastes as Feedstock for Enzyme construction: observe and take advantage of the rising and precious Use thoughts of Waste Biomass explores the present cutting-edge bioprocesses in enzyme creation utilizing agro-industrial wastes with admire to their iteration, present tools of disposal, the issues confronted when it comes to waste and rules, and capability value-added protocols for those wastes.
- The Solid Waste Handbook: A Practical Guide
- Tailings and mine waste '04: proceedings of the Eleventh Tailings and Mine Waste Conference, 10-13 October 2004, Vail, Colorado, USA
- Comprehensive Utilization of Citrus By-Products
- Domestic Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries
- Developments in tidal energy : proceedings of the Third Conference on Tidal Power
Additional resources for Risk-Based Waste Classification in California (Compass Series)
Air, surface water, and soil). For any particular chemical, the numeric value of the TTLC, expressed in milligrams per kilogram, is generally 100 times the numeric value of the STLC, expressed in milligrams per liter. TTLCs have been derived for 38 chemicals. If the concentration of any of these chemicals in a waste exceeds the TTLC for that chemical, the waste is considered to be hazardous and is subject to disposal in a class I landfill. The current system has only one set of toxicity thresholds for STLCs or TTLCs.
Under California's regulations, certain wastes not classified as hazardous under RCRA may be classified and managed as hazardous waste if DTSC determines that they might adversely affect human health or the environment when disposed of as unregulated wastes. Current Waste-Classification System Like the federal RCRA, the DTSC waste-classification system identifies wastes as hazardous on the basis of their ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity. California uses the federal RCRA criteria for ignitability and reactivity.
That assessment is performed using a two-step approach. The first step consists of a comparison of the human toxicity exit concentration designated in the proposed EPA Hazardous Waste Identification Rule (HWIR) (61 Fed. Register 18780, Apr. 29, 1996) with the ecological toxicity exit concentration in that same proposal. If, for a particular chemical, the human toxicity exit concentration was lower than the ecological toxicity exit concentration in the HWIR proposal, DTSC considered that the criterion derived in the lower TTLC exposure scenario, based on human toxicity, would also protect the environment.