Doing Philosophy by Joel Feinberg
By Joel Feinberg
Transparent and concise, this short advisor can help you write a winning paper-even when you've got no earlier formal heritage in writing philosophy papers. Contents contain subject choice, outlines, drafts, right and mistaken citation, argument improvement and assessment, ideas of fine writing, type, standards for grading pupil papers, and a overview of universal grammatical and dictional error. moreover, the ebook devotes a number of chapters to simple ideas in common sense, that have confirmed precious for philosophy scholars such as you during significantly contemplating and writing in regards to the principles and arguments they stumble upon.
Read Online or Download Doing Philosophy PDF
Best history & surveys books
This publication highlights Kant's basic distinction among the mechanistic and dynamical conceptions of topic, that's valuable to his perspectives in regards to the foundations of physics, and is healthier understood when it comes to the distinction among items of sensibility and issues in themselves.
For Self-Examination and its spouse piece pass judgement on for your self! are the end result of Søren Kierkegaard's "second authorship," which his Concluding Unscientific Postscript. one of the easiest and so much without problems comprehended of Kierkegaard's books, the 2 works are a part of the signed direct communications, as wonderful from his past pseudonymous writings.
The 1st dictionary devoted to Badiou's paintings, bringing jointly over 35 top students within the fieldFrom Antiphilosophy to Worlds and from Beckett to Wittgenstein, over ninety entries during this dictionary offer specific motives and engagements along with his key ideas and a few of his significant interlocutors.
First released in 1848, Christian Discourses is a quartet of items written and organized in contrasting kinds. elements One and 3, "The Cares of the Pagans" and "Thoughts That Wound from Behind--for Upbuilding," function a polemical overture to Kierkegaard's collision with the status quo of Christendom.
- The Philosophy of Simondon: Between technology and individuation
- Simone Weil: An Introduction to Her Thought
- Die philosophischen Schriften: Band III
- The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other (Warwick Studies in Philosophy and Literature)
- Kierkegaard Within Your Grasp
Additional resources for Doing Philosophy
The first four attempts, then, to solve the problem of “sexist pronouns,” are in my view, failures. I reject or find flawed “his,” “her,” “his or her,” and “their” (with a singular subject). By my reckoning, that leaves three other formulations, and I find each of these a satisfactory solution to the sexist pronoun problem. The first is the all-plural formulation: • All persons should do their own thing. Here the plural pronoun agrees with a plural subject and all is harmony. Second, we could write that— • One should do one’s own thing.
If you are writing about a relationship between two things, then you use, as I just did, the word “between,” but if a relationship connects more than two things, then “among” is the preferred preposition. Thus, • World War II was a conflict among many countries, though in military terms it was primarily between Germany and the Soviet Union. There was a strong competition between many companies. A love affair broke out among Robert and Shirley. These latter two examples turn the rule upside down.
No matter what sort of hypothetical audience your paper speaks to, however, it is important that it be intelligible to those persons, for otherwise your paper will be beyond the understanding of precisely the sort of reader you would like to reach. If you are to communicate at all, your prose must be intelligible; for your prose to be intelligible it must be clear; and the great enemy of clarity is wordiness. The way to avoid wordiness is to cultivate the basic communicative virtues— simplicity, directness, and economy.